
My husband appeared to be having words with me. He had received this nifty new coffee maker as a birthday gift. It brewed single servings of coffee, tea, or hot chocolate from pre-made packets; the perfect solution for our on-the-run family.
I usually brew a pot of decaf each morning including one scoop of regular French roast; my caffeine quota for the day. My husband had returned from Costco with a supply of beverage packets including half-caf single servings for me.
But I didn’t like them. I prefer dark roasts and hated to squander my meager caffeine allotment on substandard product. When he noticed I had ignored them—in the middle of a trying work week and perhaps overdue for a stiff cup of Joe himself–he appeared to have a meltdown that quickly escalated as ego meltdowns will from the specific: “You don’t like the coffee I bought you,” to the abstract:
“You never like anything I buy you.”
“You’re impossible to please.”
“You always…”
“Why can’t you…?”
“Even the dog thinks you’re…”
Dragging our adorable little dog into it really was the last straw, the ego pointed out.
As I charged out into the morning sunrise headed for the nearest Starbuck’s to order my venti three-quarter decaf light room Americano in retaliation a part of my mind recognized I was at it again. Mindlessly attempting to momentarily relieve the buried guilt in my mind by projecting it outside myself. Once more following what the Course calls “the ego’s plan for salvation” by denying responsibility for the original belief that I had separated from God in the first place. Experiencing it in the form of a secretly welcome “unprovoked” attack by an angry husband; conveniently throwing my relative innocence into sharp relief.
This is my mind on ego, I reminded myself as the Course teaches. How many times had I been here before? Did I really want to swallow this picture of unfair treatment I had painted over a freaking cup of coffee? To disrupt my morning with the counter-attack my mind on ego craved even more than caffeine?
“There has to be another way,” I remembered. Silently repeating the phrase A Course in Miracles collaborator Bill Thetford had uttered to Course scribe and colleague Helen Schucman all those decades ago at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons. The question that had invited the Course’s answer from our right mind in the form of a radical spiritual psychology advocating a unique form of forgiveness in the first place.
“There has to be another way.”
Bill’s earnest words echoed in my head, catapulting me into an entertaining, right-minded fantasy. I had heard an NPR story the day before about the Trust for Public Lands’ efforts to rescue the Hollywood sign and surrounding acreage from encroaching development. I had always been drawn to images of that sign and, as a child, had even vowed to climb it one day; a yet unrealized dream. With Southern California still weighing heavily on my brain following our recent spring break tour of prospective colleges with our daughter I now imagined myself sitting atop that very sign with Jesus, peering down on the self-aggrandizing chaos of Los Angeles; discussing the seemingly more pressing case of the self-aggrandizing chaos in my own kitchen.
“That man is a saint,” Jesus said.
Not exactly what I was hoping to hear.
“Sorry, you asked.”
I smiled. I suppose I had. A Course in Miracles teaches us that what we’re really asking when we cry out for help is to see (experience) all that appears to be happening to us differently. When we choose against the ego’s drama of attack and defense that appears to have hijacked our peace of mind, we automatically become right-minded, taking the seeming external problem back to its internal cause and correction in the mind.
We see with Christ’s (a symbol of the embodied awakened mind used in A Course in Miracles) “vision.” A way of seeing that has nothing to do with the body’s senses made to reinforce a dualistic world invented to defend against the whole, uninterrupted, eternal love we believe we pushed away. We see the error of our guilt projected onto another body, recognize it as our own mistaken call for the love we believe we squandered, and answer it by holding the other harmless, allowing us to re-experience our own shared innocence.
I sighed. “I suppose he has put up with a lot over the years,” I said, thinking of my husband. How my penchant for strongly brewed dark roast coffee was really just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. I had been born opinionated, after all, and still had a lot of opinions. Still tended in one way or another to make them known.
“Right?” Jesus said. “And that girl of yours.”
“Wait a minute.”
“You were just thinking about her.”
My mind had in fact been wandering. Reviewing my daughter’s most recent lack of regard for my delicate feelings. That tone in her voice. That roll of her eyes. That toss of her beautiful hair.
“She’s been a good sport from the day she came in,” Jesus said.
Easy for you to say, I thought. I mean, colic; the complete inability to nap. Rolling off the bed at a week old—infants were not supposed to be able to do that–and nearly scaring me to death. Getting kicked out of day care at six months, I mean. And that was just the first year. I could go on.
“You could.”
“But I don’t really want to, do I?”
“Not so much.”
I smiled. The Course tells us Jesus doesn’t know about this world. That asking him for specific advice is akin to asking him to make the error of our perception of competing interests real. And yet in answer to Bill and Helen’s cry for help with a troubled relationship in a conflicted environment he spoke. And he continues to meet us where we think we are in the condition we think we’re in if we let him. On this particular day, I needed to picture him in the flesh, speaking to the individual I had again mistaken for my real self even as I reminded myself this could not be.
When we catch ourselves feeling unfairly treated by what the Course calls our “special relationships,” those people we have chosen to meet our expectations for special love and special hate–to ultimately fail us as all partners do–we can always choose again to look with Jesus. When we do we figuratively rise “above the battleground”–as the Course puts it–where nothing seems quite so serious anymore. Where we can look beyond the movie of unrelenting special interests playing out in the smoggy valley we call life to the reality of our true nature where we remain eternally awake, supported, and complete, dreaming of fragmented exile. And learn to gently smile at our folly.
“The overlooking of the battleground is now your purpose. Be lifted up and from a higher place look down upon it. From there will your perspective be quite different…And the perspective coming from this choice shows you the battle is not real, and easily escaped. Bodies may battle, but the clash of forms is meaningless. And it is over when you realize it never was begun.”
“That man really is a saint,” I said.
“Right?”
“And she’s a good kid.”
“You’re not so bad yourself,” he said.
“Yeah. But you say that to everybody.”
Jesus smiled. “Pass the popcorn, would you please,” he said
NOTE: Check out my recent interview with renowned Course teacher, author, and scholar Dr. Kenneth Wapnick on our new website: www.schoolofreason.org. Click the “Media” tab.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags: A Course in Miracles, Awakening, battleground, body, decision maker, ego, Forays in Forgiveness, forgiveness, inspiration, personal, right mind, spirituality, Susan Dugan